Categories
Archives
- March 2010 (4)
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (2)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (5)
- September 2009 (2)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (7)
- May 2009 (5)
- April 2009 (11)
- March 2009 (13)
- February 2009 (12)
- January 2009 (6)
- October 2008 (3)
- September 2008 (5)
- August 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (1)
- February 2008 (2)
- December 2007 (1)
- November 2007 (1)
- October 2007 (1)
- April 2007 (1)
- April 2005 (1)
User Experience and Corporate Decision Making
As @c2austin pointed out yesterday, Fast Company's Twitter stream recently rehashed an ongoing debate about website user experience design in large corporations and the potential havoc having too many departments involved in the design process can have. The Fast Company article, which you can read in its entirety here, describes how a peeved designer wrote an open letter to American Airlines blasting such a high-profile company for having a website that is incredibly difficult from a usability standpoint. He wrote:
If I was running a company with the distinction and history of American Airlines, I would be embarrassed--no ashamed--to have a Web site with a customer experience as terrible as the one you have now...Your Web site is abusive to your customers, it is limiting your revenue possibilities, and it is permanently destroying the brand and image of your company in the mind of every visitor.
To prove his point, he even donated some time and offered up a solution, seen here as compared to the original:

His open letter actually received a response from a member of the user experience team at American Airlines explaining that, unfortunately, it's not their lack of abilities, but rather the sheer size of the company and numerous corporate layers and that inhibit them from delivering a positive user experience.
Sad. But true. It highlights a problem that we wrestle with often when clients come to us to deliver a new interactive experience for their business: Too many cooks in the kitchen. While at times we understand the need for more than one party within a company to be responsible for making design decisions, we also feel strongly that the best designs come from a clear, singular vision. This vision, combined with a solid understanding of user wants/needs, and an interactive design team adept at creating the best possible solution will always result in a stronger end product than anything that comes from design by committee.
by








Comments
Posted on January 27th, 2010 at 4:25 PM
I agree. It's almost as if the alternative site needs a call-out that upon clicking takes them to a microsite that houses corporate/HR information. Not having done any research, it still seems like the two audiences (those seeking flight info vs those seeking corporate info) don't really intertwine much...
Thanks for the comments!
by Garret Ohm
Posted on January 27th, 2010 at 4:21 PM
I will say I agree with some of the criticism of the original post. While his "alternative" site looks nice and clean, it serves one purpose only among many LEGITIMATE aims of an airline (or any major corporate) site. That said, I think the challenge is understanding the myriad goals and objectives of a corporate site, then having an empowered leader and team that understands user experience and functionality -- and how to put together a Web site that meets objectives, embodies the brand, prioritizes information and makes transaction easy and effective. I see companies concede decision making to multiple execs/divisions so everyone/thing ends up top of fold, leaving brand, message and call to action muddled and ineffective.
by Cathy